The Demise of Effects-based Resource Management
what went wrong with internalising the externality?
Keywords:Resource Management Act, Effects-based, Externalities, Internalisation, Natural and Built Environment Act
A core principle underlying the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) is that of effects based resource management: managing the effects of activities on the environment, rather than the activities themselves. In economics parlance, this has strong links to the concept of internalising the externality, where the costs or benefits of activities are borne by those undertaking the activities, rather than by third parties. When externalities are internalised, society’s wellbeing is improved. However, the widely held view is that the RMA has not made society any better off. A contributor to this was the poor implementation of the internalisation principle in the RMA, particularly the limited use of price signals, high transaction costs, and the poor application of cost–benefit analysis. The replacement for the RMA, the Natural and Built Environment Act (NBEA), proposes to shift the focus away from an effects based approach to an outcomes-based one. While the NBEA could be used to better implement an internalisation principle, its proposed drafting does not always attempt to do so, and its explicit shift to an outcomes-based approach is likely to make it even more difficult for externalities to be internalised.
Permission: In the interest of promoting debate and wider dissemination, the IGPS encourages use of all or part of the articles appearing in PQ, where there is no element of commercial gain. Appropriate acknowledgement of both author and source should be made in all cases. The IGPS retains copyright. Please direct requests for permission to reprint articles from this publication to firstname.lastname@example.org.