(Re)Shaping spaces for learning

Experiences from Aotearoa New Zealand

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26686/nzaroe.v26.6858

Keywords:

design for learning, educational design, innovative learning environments, learning spaces

Abstract

Schools and universities in Aotearoa New Zealand have been transitioning into new spatial configurations. These spaces are being carefully (re)designed to accommodate technology-rich activity, and to enable collaborative teaching and learning in ways that actively engage students in scaffolded inquiry. As teachers and students shift from traditional classroom layouts into flexible learning arrangements, educators are having to deeply rethink their own practices. In addition, the recent Covid-19 outbreak raised new questions in education about the role of technology in learning. This article argues that it is critical that Aotearoa educators understand (i) how to (re)design and (re)configure learning spaces in ways that support what they value in learning; and (ii) how they can tap on the digital to extend students experiences, both across and beyond schools and universities’ physical settings. The article introduces a way of framing the design and analysis of complex learning situations and reports on qualitative findings from a recent survey, which explored educators’ experiences of learning environments across Aotearoa New Zealand.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lucila Carvalho, Massey University

Lucila Carvalho is a senior lecturer in e-learning and digital technologies at Massey University, New Zealand. Lucila’s research explores how culture and social structures shape the design and use of technology, and how technology influences cultural and social experiences. Her research interests are in the areas of design, technology and learning in both formal and non-formal settings.

References

Benade, L., & Jackson, M. (Eds.) (2020). Design, education and pedagogy. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003024781

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Carvalho, L., Nicholson, T., Yeoman, P., & Thibaut, P. (2020). Space matters: Framing the New Zealand learning landscape. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 307-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09311-4

Fenwick, T. (2015). Sociomateriality and learning: A critical approach. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Learning (pp. 83-93). London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473915213.n8

Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2014). Framing the analysis of learning network architectures. In L. Carvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks (pp. 48-70). New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203591093

OECD (2017). Learning Environments Evaluation Program. http://www.oecd.org/education/LEEP_Brochure_OECD.pdf

OECD (2018). The OECD school user survey: Improving learning spaces together.

https://www.oecd.org/education/effective-learning-environments/

Te Kete Ipurangi [TKI] (2021, February 24). Innovative Learning Environments. New Zealand Ministry of Education. http://elearning.tki.org.nz/Leadership/Strategic-planning/Planning-an-ILE

Downloads

Published

2021-07-01