Minoritarian Co-governance in Rotorua District Thwarted by Pluralistic Majoritarianism, 2013–23

Authors

  • Reynold Macpherson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v21i1.9726

Keywords:

minoritarianism, majoritarianism, co-governance, Rotorua Lakes Council, Te Arawa, Ngäti Whakaue, Rotorua District Residents and Ratepayers

Abstract

Based on qualitative research, including participant observation, this article examines Rotorua Lakes Council’s 2013–23 pursuit of 50/50 co-governance with Te Arawa iwi. Despite some Treaty-based support, public opinion leaned towards equal suffrage. Te Tatau o Te Arawa nominees were given places on council subcommittees with voting rights. Concerns over authoritarianism, financial mismanagement, secrecy and homelessness then spurred opposition to 50/50 co-governance. A 2021 local bill for full co-governance was denied over potential Bill of Rights conflicts. The Local Government Commission’s determination of proportional representation for Rotorua, using general, Māori and rural wards, highlights New Zealand’s struggle to balance majority rule and minority protections. Pluralistic majoritarianism is suggested as a pathway to more inclusive governance in local and central governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Reynold Macpherson

Reynold Macpherson is a retired university academic, independent scholar and consultant. He can be contacted at reynold@reynoldmacpherson.ac.nz.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-17