Reviving the Proposal For a Parliamentary Budget Officer

Authors

  • Ian Ball Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington
  • Tim Irwin
  • Graham Scott

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v20i3.9558

Keywords:

Budgeting, Fiscal Management, Public Finance, Parliament, Independent Fiscal Institutions

Abstract

The 2019 proposal that New Zealand create a parliamentary budget officer should be revived, but with certain changes. First, the parliamentary budget officer should not be asked to estimate the cost of political parties’ electoral platforms, since that is not a proper function of an officer of Parliament, and the political sensitivity and resource intensiveness of such costings could interfere with the officer’s ability to help Parliament hold the executive to account. Second, the parliamentary budget officer should have a broader scope to comment on public finances than was envisaged in 2019. Third, the creation of a parliamentary budget officer should be accompanied by consideration of other ways of strengthening Parliament’s effectiveness in scrutinising public finances, such as having a member of the opposition chair the Finance and Expenditure Committee.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ian Ball, Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington

Ian Ball is an adjunct professor in the School of Accounting and Commercial Law at Te Herenga Waka Victoria University of Wellington.

Tim Irwin

Tim Irwin is an Auckland-based consultant, having worked previously as an economist for the Treasury, IMF and World Bank.

Graham Scott

Graham Scott is a former secretary to the Treasury and, among other public roles, served as a member of the New Zealand Productivity Commission.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-19