Were We Being Sold a Lemon? Analysing the distributional implications for those Labour’s proposed social insurance scheme would have covered
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v19i2.8237Keywords:
social welfare, social insurance, unemployment insurance, model-family analysis, New ZealandAbstract
In February 2023, the Labour government announced that it was shelving its proposed income insurance scheme for now, but indicated that the scheme may be revived if Labour is re-elected in October. The proposal raised many equity and efficiency issues, including the inequities of a two-tier system which favours workers who would be covered by the scheme ahead of others who would not. This article focuses on differences in outcomes within the insured group. Using a family vignette methodology, it finds that the scheme, layered on top of existing welfare provisions, would have been highly regressive and poor value for money for many low- and middle-income families.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Permission: In the interest of promoting debate and wider dissemination, the IGPS encourages use of all or part of the articles appearing in PQ, where there is no element of commercial gain. Appropriate acknowledgement of both author and source should be made in all cases. The IGPS retains copyright. Please direct requests for permission to reprint articles from this publication to igps@vuw.ac.nz.