Free and Frank Advice and the Official Information Act

balancing competing principles of good government

Authors

  • Andrew Kibblewhite
  • Peter Boshier

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v14i2.5088

Keywords:

free and frank advice, stewardship, official information, Official Information Act, expectations

Abstract

Concern exists that New Zealand hasn’t struck the right balance between two potentially competing principles of good government: officials should provide free and frank advice to ministers, and the public should have opportunities to participate in decision making and hold the government to account. Steps we have taken to address this include: strengthening constitutional underpinnings for free and frank advice (Cabinet Manual changes and issuing expectations for officials); a work programme to improve government agency practice in relation to the Official Information Act; and the Office of the Ombudsman reducing uncertainty about when advice can be withheld by issuing new principles-based guidance and providing more advisory services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-14