Aid in dying in the High Court: Seales v Attorney General
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v11i3.4558Keywords:
Crimes Act 1961, New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, assisting suicide, Justice CollinsAbstract
As her inevitable death from brain cancer approached, a 42-year-old lawyer named Lecretia Seales wanted the option of receiving aid in dying from her (unnamed) general practitioner, who in turn was willing to provide that aid. Seales’ own actions would not breach the law; it has not been an offence in New Zealand for anyone to attempt to end her or his own life since 1961. However, should a doctor aid Seales to do so, she or he ran the risk of arrest and prosecution for breaching the Crimes Act 1961. A doctor who directly administers a lethal dose of medication at Seales’ request for the purpose of ending her life might be prosecuted for murder or manslaughter under section 160 of the Crimes Act. Providing Seales with a lethal dose of medication in the knowledge she may self-administer it to end her life some time in the future might lead to a prosecution for aiding or abetting suicide under section 179.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Permission: In the interest of promoting debate and wider dissemination, the IGPS encourages use of all or part of the articles appearing in PQ, where there is no element of commercial gain. Appropriate acknowledgement of both author and source should be made in all cases. The IGPS retains copyright. Please direct requests for permission to reprint articles from this publication to igps@vuw.ac.nz.