Citizens’ assemblies and policy reform in New Zealand

Authors

  • Janine Hayward

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v9i2.4446

Keywords:

Electoral Commission, electoral reform, electoral referendum, Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) review, first past the post (FPP), preferential voting (PV), single transferable vote (STV), supplementary member (SM), non-entrenched constitution, Electoral Finance Bill

Abstract

In 2011 New Zealand held a referendum on the future of its voting system for general elections. Following the referendum, the current voting system was retained, and the Electoral Commission reviewed the system and made recommendations for change in late 2012. In early 2013 the government’s response to those recommendations is still awaited. Recognising the importance of this process, this article considers an alternative approach to electoral reform, drawing on the experiences of Canada’s and Holland’s use of citizens’ assemblies in the electoral policy-making process. The article considers the merits and limitations of citizens’ assemblies for electoral reform, particularly in the New Zealand context. It proposes the form and function of a citizens’ assembly on electoral reform in New Zealand to complement the reform process. Overseas experience demonstrates that, with some caveats, a citizens’ assembly remains a possibility for electoral reform and other constitutional policy change in New Zealand in the future. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2013-05-01