Mining in the New Zealand economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v7i1.4371Keywords:
debate over mining activity in New Zealand’s conservation estate, economics of mining in New Zealand, resource-intensive extractive activities, Resource Management Act, social cost-benefit analysis (SCBA), schedule 4 debate, income distribution and employment, offshore ownership of ironsands, gold and silver mining, and oil and gas, environmental damage caused by miningAbstract
Like most productive activities, mining contributes to human welfare. Also like most economic activities, mining is best done where the relevant resources are relatively abundant and where economic costs (in the widest sense) are lowest. Mining will not increase economic welfare – on the contrary, it will often reduce it – if done in the wrong place, or in the wrong way, or without a proper legal and regulatory framework. Mining therefore presents industryspecific problems for regulators and policy makers, which cannot be finessed by overgeneralised rhetoric or glamorous photography. This paper reviews some of the key policy issues to be borne in mind in the ongoing debate over the expansion of mining activity in New Zealand’s conservation estate, and summarises the results of some recent statistical research on the economics of mining in New Zealand
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Permission: In the interest of promoting debate and wider dissemination, the IGPS encourages use of all or part of the articles appearing in PQ, where there is no element of commercial gain. Appropriate acknowledgement of both author and source should be made in all cases. The IGPS retains copyright. Please direct requests for permission to reprint articles from this publication to igps@vuw.ac.nz.