Contemporary issues in Canadian political finance regulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v6i3.4342Keywords:
British constitutional traditions, Canadian political finance regime, federal parliament, Canada Elections Act, Charter review, Expenditure limit arbitrageAbstract
Canada shares with New Zealand a heritage of British constitutional traditions and the Westminster form of parliamentary government. These common origins make comparative study of the two countries’ experiences regulating political finance inviting. Canada and New Zealand, however, differ in important ways which have had significant impacts on the regulation of political finance. This article outlines the Canadian political finance regime and identifies some contemporary issues that may be of interest to observers from New Zealand.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Permission: In the interest of promoting debate and wider dissemination, the IGPS encourages use of all or part of the articles appearing in PQ, where there is no element of commercial gain. Appropriate acknowledgement of both author and source should be made in all cases. The IGPS retains copyright. Please direct requests for permission to reprint articles from this publication to igps@vuw.ac.nz.