Deregulatory irresponsibility: takings, transfers and transcendental institutionalism

Authors

  • Geoff Bertram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v6i2.4336

Keywords:

Regulatory Responsibility Bill, cost-benefit, Takings, impairment and compensation, Pareto gains, Redistribution, effective regulation

Abstract

The taskforce on the Regulatory Responsibility Bill has put forward what it considers to be six ‘broadly accepted principles of good legislation’. I shall argue, from the standpoint of an economist, against this description. In their present form, several of the principles have extreme implications for policy; and some fundamental requirements of good legislation are missing entirely from the taskforce’s list, and apparently will have to be defended before the courts every time they are implemented. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2010-05-01