To harmonise or not to harmonise, should that be the question? Emissions trading schemes in New Zealand and Australia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v5i4.4313Keywords:
regulatory requirements, BRIICs (Brazil, Russia, India, Indonesia and China), United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), ETS, Kyoto Protocol, Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS), legally-binding commitments, Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ)Abstract
The governments of New Zealand and Australia are proposing to implement greenhouse gas emissions trading schemes (ETS) to help drive down carbon pollution within their borders. Although both countries enjoy a political consensus in favour of emissions trading, the Parliament of each country is deeply divided along party political lines about the appropriate design of the irrespective schemes.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Permission: In the interest of promoting debate and wider dissemination, the IGPS encourages use of all or part of the articles appearing in PQ, where there is no element of commercial gain. Appropriate acknowledgement of both author and source should be made in all cases. The IGPS retains copyright. Please direct requests for permission to reprint articles from this publication to igps@vuw.ac.nz.
