What are the limits to public service advising? The ‘Public Argument’ test
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v1i3.4252Keywords:
Code of Public Service Conduct, policy decisions, Robert Gregory, political environment, TreasuryAbstract
Some Wellington policy advisers seem to feel underemployed these days. Although the volume of work is reportedly high, they complain about being relegated to implementing policies rather than formulating them. Where big picture policy is concerned, it is said that governments mostly develop their ideas outside the public service’s field of vision, in party caucuses, think tanks, and prime ministers’ inner circles, or in consultation with special advisers who report directly to ministers. Policy advisers are then left to fill in the blanks. Some imply that things used to be ‘better’ and that advisers used to exert more leverage over high-level policy directions.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Permission: In the interest of promoting debate and wider dissemination, the IGPS encourages use of all or part of the articles appearing in PQ, where there is no element of commercial gain. Appropriate acknowledgement of both author and source should be made in all cases. The IGPS retains copyright. Please direct requests for permission to reprint articles from this publication to igps@vuw.ac.nz.