Priorities For Public Investment Related to Voluntary Biodiversity Credit Markets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v22i2.10731Keywords:
Biodiversity credit market, Public investment, Nature market, Voluntary market, Conservation, Market mechanismsAbstract
Nascent voluntary biodiversity credit markets (otherwise known as ‘voluntary nature markets’) operate globally and in Aotearoa New Zealand, promising sustained financial support for conservation initiatives from private investors. Voluntary biodiversity credit markets may operate independently of government, but their risks engage core government concerns, including protecting the public interest in a healthy environment. The optimal role of public investment in this context is contested. We suggest three priority areas for public investment: maintaining core conservation spending; investing in underlying spatial and ecological data; and promulgating and implementing regulatory safeguard mechanisms. Investment in avoiding or mitigating risks in market mechanisms should enjoy the same government attention as efforts to promote such mechanisms. Likewise, addressing the risks should be treated as core public infrastructure for any voluntary biodiversity market.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Permission: In the interest of promoting debate and wider dissemination, the IGPS encourages use of all or part of the articles appearing in PQ, where there is no element of commercial gain. Appropriate acknowledgement of both author and source should be made in all cases. Please direct requests for permission to reprint articles from this publication to Policy-Quarterly@vuw.ac.nz.
