‘Special Treatment’ a 30-year case study exploring whether Pacific peoples as an ethnic minority are being privileged in public policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v22i2.10728Keywords:
Public policy, Metal health, Pacific peoples, Equity, Ethnic-specific policy, Political discourseAbstract
This article interrogates claims of ‘special treatment’ for ethnic minorities by examining the alignment between documented Pacific mental health need and 30 years of public mental health and Pacific health policy (alongside relevant estimates of appropriations). Using frequency analysis and close reading, it finds that despite longstanding and well‑evidenced inequities, Pacific mental health is inconsistently addressed, rarely prioritised, and seldom supported through targeted investment. Analysis by governing party shows that both inclusion and prioritisation are generally lower under National‑led governments. While Labour‑led governments have adopted more inclusive rhetoric, this has not consistently translated into substantive policy action or resourcing. Overall, the study finds that claims of special treatment for Pacific peoples as an ethnic minority are supported by neither policy content nor investment.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Permission: In the interest of promoting debate and wider dissemination, the IGPS encourages use of all or part of the articles appearing in PQ, where there is no element of commercial gain. Appropriate acknowledgement of both author and source should be made in all cases. Please direct requests for permission to reprint articles from this publication to Policy-Quarterly@vuw.ac.nz.
