Whānau Ora 2.0: the real problem isn’t the who, it’s the what

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v22i1.10503

Keywords:

Whānau Ora, self-determination, mana motuhake, social investment, social impact, commissioning models

Abstract

The evolution of Whānau Ora is often seen as a contest between providers, but the deeper issue is the erosion of its original institutional logic. This shift weakens the policy’s transformative potential and risks diminishing Indigenous-led approaches to entrenched social issues. As social investment becomes more influential, understanding and intentionally applying models of impact creation is vital. Whānau Ora’s foundation in self-determination and relational practice offers valuable lessons that could significantly enhance contemporary investment strategies, but only if its core logic is preserved and applied with fidelity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sascha McMeeking, Te Wānanga o Aotearoa

Sacha McMeeking is a researcher and practitioner focused on social change and causal impact mechanisms to guide iwi and government investment. She was engaged in establishing Te Pūtahitanga and is currently a senior research fellow with Te Wānanga o Aotearoa

Catherine Leonard, Ihi Research

Catherine Leonard is research manager at Ihi Research, leading projects on social impact and community-driven change. A psychologist with a doctorate in education, she specialises in qualitative methods and evidence of transformation.

Helen Leahy, Ngā Waihua o Paerangi Trust

Helen Leahy is pou arahi /chief executive of Ngā Waihua o Paerangi Trust and former head of Te Pūtahitanga o Te Waipounamu. She has led across Māori Development, parliamentary strategy and governance, and is the author of Crossing the Floor: the story of Tariana Turia.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-20