Rights disputes procedures in Canada and New Zealand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26686/nzjir.v15i2.3493Abstract
This paper examines the resolution of rights disputes in Canada and New Zealand. It begins with an overview of the statutory distinction between interest and rights disputes and traces the development of rights disputes procedures in both countries. This is followed by a comparison of the characteristics of rights disputes procedures in each country, e.g., scope and third-party involvement. The final section considers the performance of disputes procedures, including whether they act as a strike substitute and provide timely and cost effective dispute resolution. The implications of these findings for employment justice also are considered.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
1990-07-05
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright of published articles is held by the Foundation for Industrial Relations Research and Education.