Beginning Literacy: The Small-Unit Versus Large-Unit Debate Continues
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26686/nzaroe.v0i13.1455Keywords:
Languages, Language Education and LiteracyAbstract
This article presents a review of the literature on the small- versus large-unit debate, followed by an analysis of the Ready to Read Teacher Support Material in order to determine where it stands in relation to the issue over whether only grapheme-phoneme correspondences should be taught to beginning readers, or whether they should also be taught rime-analogy strategies. The literature review shows the small-units-first argument as the more robust, and the analysis of the Ready to Read support material shows the small-units-first argument has been relatively more influential in the development of teaching suggestions for readers at the beginning of instruction.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2003-07-01
Issue
Section
Articles
License
The Author(s) retain ownership of the copyright in the Article but hereby grant the Publisher an exclusive license to publish the article.
NZAROE gives authors full permission to deposit their articles in publicly accessible institutional repositories, providing that:
- Articles are placed in repositories after publication.
- Metadata about articles include the DOI and journal issue information.