The Irony of Educational Review

Authors

  • David Mckenzie

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26686/nzaroe.v0i4.1097

Keywords:

Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability

Abstract

It is argued that the increasing criticisms of the Education Review Office which have been voiced in 1994 owe their origin to the failure of the Picot Committee to grasp that a distanced review authority which is required to act judgementally will be unable to facilitate the co-operative activity that the process of educational review requires. It is proposed that the ERO structure be altered to encourage the incorporation of peer-review in the process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

David Mckenzie

Downloads

Published

1994-12-05

Issue

Vol. 4 (1994): New Zealand Annual Review of Education

Section

Articles

License

The Author(s) retain ownership of the copyright in the Article but hereby grant the Publisher an exclusive license to publish the article.

NZAROE gives authors full permission to deposit their articles in publicly accessible institutional repositories, providing that:

  • Articles are placed in repositories after publication.
  • Metadata about articles include the DOI and journal issue information.