The Irony of Educational Review
AbstractIt is argued that the increasing criticisms of the Education Review Office which have been voiced in 1994 owe their origin to the failure of the Picot Committee to grasp that a distanced review authority which is required to act judgementally will be unable to facilitate the co-operative activity that the process of educational review requires. It is proposed that the ERO structure be altered to encourage the incorporation of peer-review in the process.
Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
MCKENZIE, David. The Irony of Educational Review. The New Zealand Annual Review of Education, [S.l.], n. 4, dec. 1994. ISSN 1178-3311. Available at: <https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/nzaroe/article/view/1097>. Date accessed: 25 oct. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.26686/nzaroe.v0i4.1097.
Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability
NZAROE gives authors full permission to deposit their articles in publicly accessible institutional repositories, providing that:
- Articles are placed in repositories after publication.
- Metadata about articles include the DOI and journal issue information.