Engaging, Standing, and Stepping

Evaluating Anthropological Activism on an Amazonian Petro-Frontier

  • Michael Cepek The University of Texas at San Antonio


Anthropologists and activists portray the lives and lands of Ecuador’s Indigenous Cofán people as a case study of the damage caused by petroleum extraction. Yet during my fieldwork on the issue, I began to question the nature of the Cofán-oil encounter when the community in which I worked decided to allow oil companies onto their land. In this article, I examine my own involvements with Cofán oil politics in dialogue with Stuart Kirsch’s concept of ‘engaged anthropology’ and Kim TallBear’s call for researchers to ‘stand with’ their research subjects. I argue that anthropological activism is necessarily a complex and shifting affair, especially when our collaborators’ perspectives diverge from our own regarding the best possible paths to their wellbeing. I suggest that the most ethical option is for anthropologists to commit themselves to continuous, co-con-structed partnerships in which they are perpetually prepared to transform their most basic political and intellectual positions.


Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
CEPEK, Michael. Engaging, Standing, and Stepping. Commoning Ethnography, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 5-24, dec. 2020. ISSN 2537-9879. Available at: <https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/ce/article/view/6645>. Date accessed: 24 jan. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.26686/ce.v3i1.6645.