Storytelling, Statistics, and the Ethics of Responsibility
Researching a welfare reform experiment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26686/ce.v2i1.5467Keywords:
cashless debit card, narrative, responsibility, decolonisation, ethicsAbstract
In this essay, I reflect on the process of conducting research into an Australian welfare reform experiment that targets Indigenous people: the trial of a cashless debit card. Selectively deployed statistical research has been key to making and contesting the political case regarding the cashless debit card’s effectiveness. However, pursuing narrative research in contradistinction to this preponderance of statistical research does not necessarily salve ongoing questions about power and research ethics, which have been reinvigorated amid renewed calls for anthropology’s decolonisation. I draw on Eve Tuck’s (2009) analysis of ‘pain narratives’ and Sujatha Fernandes’ (2017) critical account of storytelling to probe aspects of my research. When settler anthropologists elicit, listen to, collect, and then disseminate stories gifted by Indigenous interviewees, this demands we take serious ‘responsibility for the decisions we make as writers’ (Birch 2019: 26). Demystifying the particular relations and everyday processes that lie at the heart of our research practice is thus warranted.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 E. Vincent
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are licenced under the Creative Commons, which means authors retain full copyright, and can distribute and reprint their work as they wish.