https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/vuwlr/issue/feedVictoria University of Wellington Law Review2024-05-29T21:54:26+00:00Denise Blackettlaw-review@vuw.ac.nzOpen Journal Systems<p>Founded in 1953 by Professor Robert McGechan, the Victoria University of Wellington Law Review is the oldest university Law Review in New Zealand. It has a proud history of being a major publisher of significant legal articles of relevance not only to New Zealand, or our Pacific region, but also internationally.</p> <p>The VUWLR publishes four issues a year, a total of some 800 pages of quality research by international scholars, members of this faculty and our colleagues elsewhere in New Zealand, distinguished visitors and the Faculty's own students.</p>https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/vuwlr/article/view/9495The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mediation and New Zealand's Dispute Resolution System2024-05-27T22:31:28+00:00Grant Morrislaw-review@vuw.ac.nz<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed mediation practice in New Zealand's institutional, government-led mediation regimes. The introduction of lockdowns, social distancing and personal protective equipment created a "new normal" for the delivery of consensual third-party dispute resolution in this area. Many of the changes introduced during the pandemic remain despite the removal of restrictions in 2022. This article explores New Zealand's online alternative dispute resolution (ADR) capacity on the eve of the pandemic. This limited capacity was severely tested during the first lockdown in 2020, highlighting barriers and challenges but also opportunities. However, it was the second major lockdown beginning in August 2021 that cemented many of the changes. In addition to exploring the New Zealand experience, this article provides specific case studies, such as employment mediation, and make some comparisons with apposite overseas jurisdictions. ADR, and mediation in particular, is at a crossroads. A choice must now be made whether to return to a primarily in-person model or continue to emphasise online delivery.</p>2024-05-29T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/vuwlr/article/view/9496Is Land Really Unique?: Revisiting Specific Performance as the Default Remedy for Land Sale Contracts in New Zealand2024-05-27T22:35:01+00:00Moshood Abdussalamlaw-review@vuw.ac.nz<p><span class="TextRun SCXW106721359 BCX0" lang="EN-AU" xml:lang="EN-AU" data-contrast="auto"><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW106721359 BCX0">The argument put forth in this </span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW106721359 BCX0">article</span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW106721359 BCX0"> is that land sale contracts, unless proven to </span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW106721359 BCX0">possess</span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW106721359 BCX0"> unique characteristics, are not inherently different from other types of contracts. The </span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW106721359 BCX0">article</span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW106721359 BCX0"> proposes a shift from treating specific performance as the default remedy for enforcing land sale contracts. Instead, the remedy of specific performance should be considered applicable only in exceptional situations, as is the case for </span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW106721359 BCX0">contracts generally</span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW106721359 BCX0">. The </span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW106721359 BCX0">article</span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW106721359 BCX0"> also addresses the nature of damages in lieu of specific performance and suggests a reconsideration of how that remedy applies to land sale contracts.</span></span><span class="EOP SCXW106721359 BCX0" data-ccp-props="{"201341983":1,"335551550":6,"335551620":6,"335559731":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":260,"335572071":6,"335572072":4,"335572073":4278190080,"335572079":6,"335572080":4,"335572081":4278190080,"469789798":"single","469789806":"single"}"> </span></p>2024-05-29T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Moshood Abdussalamhttps://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/vuwlr/article/view/9497Banking While Insolvent: Issues Faced by Insolvent Banking Customers Around Account Closure or Suspension2024-05-27T22:38:02+00:00Carys Robsonlaw-review@vuw.ac.nzVictoria Stacelaw-review@vuw.ac.nz<p><em>This article presents evidence that suggests the major banks in New Zealand have had a practice of using their discretionary 'terms and conditions' powers to close or suspend the bank accounts of customers who go into an insolvency procedure. This can have a significant detrimental impact on the insolvent person and a blanket policy of this nature would not appear to be based on sound justification</em><em>. This article suggests that an effective way to influence the banks' practices in this area could be through the conduct of financial institutions (CoFI) regime, expected to take effect in 2025.</em></p> <p> </p>2024-05-29T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024