Multi-Link Leisure Developments Ltd v North Lanarkshire Council: Commercial Interpretation or Relief From a Bad Bargain?

Authors

  • Adèle Taylor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v43i2.5038

Abstract

In the 2011 decision Multi-Link Leisure Developments Ltd v North Lanarkshire Council, the United Kingdom Supreme Court purported to apply a business common sense approach to the interpretation of an option clause in a lease.  In particular, several of the Lords identified that the one possible interpretation of the clause would lead to a "windfall" – a significant financial advantage – for the appellant. Their reasons hinged significantly on their view that this was a consequence inconsistent with commercial sense, which the parties were unlikely to have intended. This article analyses the relevance of a "windfall" in the context of the modern common sense approach to the construction of contracts. It concludes that the Court’s reliance upon a "windfall" of this kind goes beyond the bounds of commercial interpretation and introduces problematic notions of substantive fairness into a business common sense approach to the interpretation of contracts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2012-07-02

How to Cite

Taylor, A. (2012). Multi-Link Leisure Developments Ltd v North Lanarkshire Council: Commercial Interpretation or Relief From a Bad Bargain?. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 43(2), 373–402. https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v43i2.5038