Challenges to "a Most Dangerous Doctrine" or a "Fantastic Theory" of Volitional Insanity

Authors

  • Amir Bastani
  • Colin Gavaghan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v47i4.4788

Abstract

In theory, an insanity defence can take two forms: the cognitive form (C-insanity) and the volitional form (V-insanity). The defence of C-insanity recognises that a disordered state of mind can make the ability to understand the nature of an action impossible. On the other hand, V-insanity is recognised in some common law jurisdictions, such as all jurisdictions in Australia except for Victoria and New South Wales, and is a full defence. It recognises that a disordered state of mind can make the exercise of self-control impossible. However, that disordered state of mind does not necessarily affect the understanding of the nature of the act impossible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-01

How to Cite

Bastani, A., & Gavaghan, C. (2016). Challenges to "a Most Dangerous Doctrine" or a "Fantastic Theory" of Volitional Insanity. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 47(4), 545–584. https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v47i4.4788