Academics and the Supreme Court

Authors

  • Susan Glazebrook

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v48i2.4742

Abstract

Richard Posner laments what he sees as an unfortunate gulf between academia and the courts. To assess whether there is such a gulf in New Zealand, this address analyses the role of academics and judges. It concludes that academics provide valuable insights and assistance to the courts but that their role is much wider, being at its broadest the advancement of knowledge. By contrast, the primary role of judges at all levels is to decide the case in front of them according to law. This means that academics and the judiciary are engaged in different pursuits and, while the roles may converge at times, ultimately the differences must be respected. But there can and should be constructive dialogue. In this regard, the address discusses three areas where the New Zealand Supreme Court has received criticism from academics. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-10-02

How to Cite

Glazebrook, S. (2017). Academics and the Supreme Court. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 48(2), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v48i2.4742