The Paradox Paradox Non-Paradox and Conjunction Fallacy Non-Fallacy

Abstract

Brock and Glasgow recently introduced a new definition of paradox and argue that this conception of paradox itself leads to paradox, the so-called Paradox Paradox. I show that they beg the questions during the course of their argument, but, more importantly, do so in a philosophically interesting way: it reveals a counterexample to the equivalence between being a logical truth and having a probability of one.  This has consequences regarding norms of rationality, undermining the grounds for the Conjunction Fallacy.