Full-blooded anti-exceptionalism about logic

  • Newton Da Costa
  • Jonas R. Becker Arenhart

Abstract




Problems of logical theory choice are current being widely dis- cussed in the context of anti-exceptionalist views on logic. According to those views, logic is not a special science among others, so, in particular, the methodology for theory choice should be the same in logic as for other scientific disciplines. Richard Routley advanced one such methodology which meshes well with anti-exceptionalism, and argued that it leads one to choosing one single logic, which is a kind of ultralogic. We argue that the choice for only one correct system of logic may be rejected on the basis of the methodology proposed by Routley and, furthermore, that taking anti-exceptionalism about logic seriously recommends that a pluralist view of logic should be accepted. We call this view “full-blooded anti-exceptionalism”, and the resulting view on logic, lacking a proper name, “local pluralism”.




Published
2018-07-05
How to Cite
DA COSTA, Newton; ARENHART, Jonas R. Becker. Full-blooded anti-exceptionalism about logic. The Australasian Journal of Logic, [S.l.], v. 15, n. 2, p. 362-380, july 2018. ISSN 1448-5052. Available at: <https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/ajl/article/view/4865>. Date accessed: 15 nov. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v15i2.4865.