Contraction and revision

  • Shawn Standefer University of Melbourne

Abstract

An important question for proponents of non-contractive approaches to paradox is why contraction fails. Zardini offers an answer, namely that paradoxical sentences exhibit a kind of instability. I elaborate this idea using revision theory, and I argue that while instability does motivate failures of contraction, it equally motivates failure of many principles that non-contractive theorists want to maintain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Shawn Standefer, University of Melbourne

Postdoctoral research fellow

School of Historical and Philosophical Studies, Philosophy

Published
2016-04-16
How to Cite
STANDEFER, Shawn. Contraction and revision. The Australasian Journal of Logic, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 3, apr. 2016. ISSN 1448-5052. Available at: <https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/ajl/article/view/3935>. Date accessed: 23 jan. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v13i3.3935.