Reply to Beall and Priest

  • Matti Eklund Department of Philosophy, Cornell University

Abstract

In my “Deep Inconsistency” (Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2002), I compared my meaning-inconsistency view on the liar with Graham Priest’s dialetheist view, using my view to help cast doubt on Priest’s arguments for his view. Jc Beall and Priest have recently published a reply to my article (Australasian Journal of Logic, 2007). I here respond to their criticisms. In addition, I compare the meaning–inconsistency view with Anil Gupta and Nuel Belnap’s revision theory of truth, and discuss how best to deal with the strengthened liar.

Author Biography

Matti Eklund, Department of Philosophy, Cornell University
Published
2008-11-07
How to Cite
EKLUND, Matti. Reply to Beall and Priest. The Australasian Journal of Logic, [S.l.], v. 6, nov. 2008. ISSN 1448-5052. Available at: <https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/ajl/article/view/1797>. Date accessed: 23 may 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v6i0.1797.