Not so deep inconsistency: a reply to Eklund

  • JC Beall Philosophy Department, The University of Connecticut
  • Graham Priest School of Philosophy, The University of Melbourne

Abstract

In his “Deep Inconsistency?” Eklund attacks arguments to the effect that some contradictions are true, and especially those based on the liar paradox, to be found in Priest’ In Contradiction. The point of this paper is to evaluate his case.

Author Biographies

JC Beall, Philosophy Department, The University of Connecticut
Graham Priest, School of Philosophy, The University of Melbourne
Published
2007-11-11
How to Cite
BEALL, JC; PRIEST, Graham. Not so deep inconsistency: a reply to Eklund. The Australasian Journal of Logic, [S.l.], v. 5, nov. 2007. ISSN 1448-5052. Available at: <https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/ajl/article/view/1787>. Date accessed: 23 may 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v5i0.1787.