Not so deep inconsistency: a reply to Eklund

Authors

  • JC Beall Philosophy Department, The University of Connecticut
  • Graham Priest School of Philosophy, The University of Melbourne

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v5i0.1787

Abstract

In his “Deep Inconsistency?” Eklund attacks arguments to the effect that some contradictions are true, and especially those based on the liar paradox, to be found in Priest’ In Contradiction. The point of this paper is to evaluate his case.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

JC Beall, Philosophy Department, The University of Connecticut

Graham Priest, School of Philosophy, The University of Melbourne

Downloads

Published

2007-11-11

Issue

Vol. 5 (2007): Australasian Journal of Logic

Section

Articles