Professional Skepticism and Audit Quality in an Emerging Economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26686/aafj.v3i1.9735Keywords:
Audit Quality, Professional Skepticism, Mind set theory, Emerging economies, UgandaAbstract
Purpose – Motivated by the increasing questioning of audit quality and the suspected non-application of sufficient professional skepticism by auditors to drive audit quality, the study sought to examine the relationship between professional skepticism and audit quality in an emerging economy.
Design/methodology/approach – The study adopted a cross-sectional survey methodology using a close-ended data collection instrument containing tested measures of audit quality and professional skepticism to generate quantitative data from a randomly selected sample of 201 accountants in practice and business in Uganda. Quantitative data was analyzed with the aid of a quantitative data analysis tool SPSS 22©.
Findings – Underpinned by Mindset theory, the study has revealed that both types of professional skepticism i.e. Situational/contextual and inherent personality traits professional skepticism, are significant and positive determinants of audit quality. The two types of professional skepticism explain 51.4% of the variance in audit quality. The study has further shown that with the exception of a questioning mind (which is not significant), all the other five inherent personality traits of professional skepticism are significant and positive determinants of audit quality, revelaed in order of importance as Self-determining, Interpersonal understanding, Self-confidence, Search for knowledge and Suspension of judgement. It has also been established that there are no marked differences between accountants in practice and those in employment on professional skepticism and audit quality.
Originality/Value - The study illuminates the underpinnings of professional skepticism and audit quality. It has shown the situational and inherent trait factors that enhance professional skepticism which practitioners ought to emphasize to audit staff in order to improve audit quality. The study has shown regulators of auditors a basis of evaluating auditor’s application of professional skepticism so as to improve audit quality in emerging economies.
Downloads
References
Adeniyi, S. I., & Mieseigha, E. G. (2013). "Audit tenure: An assessment of its effects on audit quality in Nigeria". International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 3(3), 275-283. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v3-i3/168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v3-i3/168
Association of Chartered Certified Accountants [ACCA] (2017), "Banishing Bias? Audit, objectivity and the value of Professional Skepticism" The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, UK. Available at www.accaglobal.com Accessed : 15th April, 2017
Al-Ajim, J. (2009), "Audit firm size, corporate governance, and audit quality: Evidence from Bahrain", Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, Vol. 25, pp 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2009.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2009.02.005
Alareeni, B. A (2019), "The associations between audit firm attributes and audit quality-specific indicators: A meta-analysis" Managerial Auditing Journal Vol. 34 No. 1, 2019 pp. 6-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-05-2017-1559 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-05-2017-1559
Al-Eissa, A. I. (2009). "Non-audit services and auditor independence: the case of Saudi Arabia" (Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University) Available at : https://vuir.vu.edu.au/2008/1/Abdulazia.pdf Accessed : 6th July, 2020
Authority for Financial Markets (AFM) (2019), "2019 Annual Report" Available at : https://www.afm.nl/en/professionals/nieuws/2020/april/jaarverslag-2019 Accessed 30th March 2021.
Bartov, E., Gul, F.A. and Tsui, J.S.L. (2000). "Discretionary-accruals models and audit Qualifications", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 421-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00015-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00015-5
Bell, T. B., Causholli, M., & Knechel, W. R. (2015). Audit firm tenure, non‐audit services, and internal assessments of audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(3), 461-509. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12078
Bennett, G. B., and R. C. Hatfield (2013), "The effect of the social mismatch between staff auditors and client management on the collection of audit evidence". The Accounting Review Vol. 88, No.1. Pp 31-50. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50286
Bratten, B., Causholli, M., & Myers, L. A. (2020), "Fair value exposure, auditor specialization, and banks' discretionary use of the loan loss provision". Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, Vol. 35 No.2, Pp 318-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X17742567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X17742567
Brazel, J. F., S. B. Jackson, T. J. Schaefer, and B. W. Stewart (2016), "The outcome effect and professional skepticism". The Accounting Review Vol. 91. No.6, Pp 1577-1599. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51448
Brazel, J.F., and Schaefer, T.J., (2017), "Research Insights-Auditor Professional Skepticism : Competence (Fraud Detection), Traits, and Conclusions & Future Research" Available at IFAC's Global Knowledge Gateway https://www.ifac.org/global-knowledge-gateway/audit-assurance/discussion/research-insights-auditor-professional-1. Accessed 10th March, 2021.
Bunge, M (1991), "A skeptic's beliefs and disbeliefs". New Ideas in Psychology Vol.9, No. 2. Pp 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(91)90017-G DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(91)90017-G
Carey, P., & Simnett, R. (2006). Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The accounting review, 81(3), 653-676. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.81.3.653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.81.3.653
Carpenter, T.D., and Reimers, J.L., (2013). Professional skepticism: The effects of a partner's influence and the level of fraud indicators on auditors' fraud judgments and actions. Behavioral Research in Accounting 25(2): 45-69. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-50468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-50468
Chen, F., Y. Hou, G. Richardson, and Ye, M., (2018). "Auditor experience and the timeliness of litigation loss contingency disclosures". Contemporary Accounting Research, 35 (2): 956- 979. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12398
Chi, W., L.A. Myers, T.C. Omer, and H. Xie. (2017), "The effects of audit partner pre-client and client-specific experience on audit quality and on perceptions of audit quality". Review of Accounting Studies 22(1): 361-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-016-9376-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-016-9376-9
Choo, F. and K. Tan. (2000). "Instruction, skepticism, and accounting students' ability to detect frauds in auditing". The Journal of Business Education 1 (Fall): 72-87
Ciołek, M. (2017), "Professional skepticism in auditing and its characteristics". Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, (474), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2017.474.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2017.474.03
Cohen, J.R., Dalton, D.W. and N.L. Harp (2017), "Neutral and Presumptive doubt perspectives of Professional Skepticism and Auditor Job Outcomes," Accounting, Organization and Society, vol. 62, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.08.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.08.003
Cronbach, L.J. (1951), "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests", Psychometrika, Vol. 16, pp. 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
DeAngelo, L.E. (1981), "Auditor size and audit quality", Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
DeFond, M., & J. Zhang (2014). "A review of archival auditing research". Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 58. No. 2, Pp 275-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
Dweck, C.S., C. Chiu & Y.Hong (1995) "Implicit Theories and Their Role in Judgments and Reactions: A Word From Two Perspectives", Psychological Inquiry, Vol.6 Np.4, pp 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
Feng, M., and C. Li. (2014). "Are Auditors Professionally Skeptical? Evidence from Auditors' Going-Concern Opinions and Management Earnings Forecasts". Journal of Accounting Research 52(5): 1061-1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12064
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981), "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error". Journal of marketing research, Vol.18, No1 Pp 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Francis, J.R. (2011), "A framework for understanding and researching audit quality", Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 125-152. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50006
Francis, J. R and Yu, M. D, (2009), "The Effect of Big Four Office Size on Audit Quality", The Accounting Review, Vol.8, Pp 1521 https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521
Field, A. (2009), Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 3rd ed., Sage Publications, London.
Goodwin, J. and D. Wu. (2016). "What is the relationship between audit partner busyness and audit quality?" Contemporary Accounting Research 33: 341-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12129
Glover, S.M., & Prawitt, D.F (2014), "Practitioner Summary-Enhancing auditor professional skepticism: The professional skepticism continuum" Current Issues in Auditing Vol.8. No.2 pp1-10. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-50895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-50895
Gollwitzer, P.M.(1990), "Action phases and mind-sets" Handbook of motivation and Cognition Vol. 2 (pp.53-92) Foundations of social behavior.
Habib, A. (2012). "Non‐audit service fees and financial reporting quality: A meta‐analysis". Abacus, 48(2), 214-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2012.00363.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2012.00363.x
Hurtt, R.K., (2010), "Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism". Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), pp.149-171. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149
Hurtt, R.K., H. Brown-Liburd, C.E. Earley, and G. Krishnamoorthy (2013). "Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research". Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory Vol. 32: Pp 45-97. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50361
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) (2014). "A Framework for Audit Quality: Key Elements That Create an Environment for Audit Quality February 2014
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) (2015) "Invitation to comment: enhancing audit quality in the public Interest - A focus on Professional skepticism, quality control, and group audits. New York, NY
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) (2016) "Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements. New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants.
Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Uganda [ICPAU], (2018), "List of Accounting Firms and Practicing Accountants as at 26th March, 2018" Available on www.icpau.ug accessed 31st March 2018.
International Federation of Accountants [IFAC] ( 2017), "Towards Enhanced Professional Skepticism", Available at : https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/Toward-Enhanced-Professional-Skepticism-IAASB-IAESB-IESBA.pdf Accessed 20th Dec, 2017
International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators [IFIAR] (2020), "Report on 2020 Survey of Inspection Findings" Available at https://www.ifiar.org/?wpdmdl=12436 Accessed 30th March 2021.
Johnson, O.A. (1978), "Skepticism and Cognitivism" Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520310131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520310131
Kaawaase, K.T., Mussa, J., Assad, E. G., Kitindi., Nkundabanyanga, K.S. (2016). "Audit quality differences amongst audit firms in a developing economy", Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Vol. 6 No.3 pp. 269-290. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-08-2013-0041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-08-2013-0041
Khurana, I.K, & Raman, K.K (2005), "Are big four audits in ASEAN countries of higher quality than Non-big four audits?", Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and economics, Vol.11, pp 139-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2004.10510640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2004.10510640
Knapp, M. (1991), "Factors that Audit Committees Use as Surrogates for Audit Quality", Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol 10 No. 1, pp. 35-52. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-9703192362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-9703192362
Knapp, C.A., and M.C. Knapp (2001). "The effects of experience and explicit fraud risk assessment in detecting fraud with analytical procedures". Accounting, Organizations and Society Vol. 26: Pp 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00005-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00005-2
Knechel, W.R., G.V. Krishnan, M. Pevzner, L.B. Shefchik, and U.K. Velury (2013), "Audit quality: Insights from the academic literature". Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 32(S1): 385-421. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50350
Krauss, P., & Zulch, H. (2013). Non-Audit services and audit quality: blessing or curse? Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 29(2), 305-326. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v29i2.7640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v29i2.7640
Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970), "Determining Sample Size for Research Activities", Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 30 pp 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Kusumawati, A. and S. Syamsuddin, (2018) "The effect of auditor quality to professional skepticism and its relationship to audit quality", International Journal of Law and Management, Vol. 60 Issue: 4, pp. 998-1008. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2017-0062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2017-0062
Kyamanywa, S.(2020), "Audit quality: Findings and initiatives for improvement" Available at http://todaysaccountant.com/audit-quality-findings-and-initiatives-for-improvement/ Accessed 30th March 2021
Lennox, C. and X. Wu. 2018. A review of the archival literature on audit partners. Accounting Horizons 32(2): 1-35. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51942
Li, C. Song, F.M. & Wong, S.M.L. (2008), "A Continuous Relation between Audit Firm Size and Audit Opinions: Evidence from China", International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 12: pp 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00374.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00374.x
Libby, R., & Luft, J. (1993). "Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment". Accounting, organizations and society, Vol. 18 No.5, Pp 425-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90040-D DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90040-D
Mahdi, S., Mohamad Reza Fakhri Mahmoudi, and Gah, A. D (2019) "A meta-analysis approach for determinants of effective factors on audit quality: Evidence from emerging market", Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Vol. 9 Issue: 2, pp.287-312. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-03-2018-0025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-03-2018-0025
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of management review, 26(3), 356-376. https://doi.org/10.2307/259182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/259182
Mardijuwono, A.W. and Subianto, C. (2018), "Independence, professionalism, professional skepticism: The relation toward the resulted audit quality", Asian Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-06-2018-0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-06-2018-0009
Mautz, R.K., and H.A. Sharaf (1961), "The Philosophy of Auditing" American Accounting Association Monograph No.6. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
Ndaba, H., Harber, M. and Maroun, W. (2021), "Audit quality implications of regulatory change in South Africa", Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-11-2020-0290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-11-2020-0290
Nelson, M.W. (2009). "A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing". Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol.28 No.2. Pp 1-34. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.1
Nelson, M.W., C.A. Proell, and A.E. Randel. 2016. Team-oriented leadership and auditors' willingness to raise audit issues. The Accounting Review 91(6): 1781-1805. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51399
Nolder, C.J., and K. Kadous (2018), "Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: A way forward" Accounting, Organizations and Society Vol. 67: pp 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.010
Olsen, C., and A. Gold. (2018) "Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors' professional skepticism". Journal of Accounting Literature 41: 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2018.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2018.03.006
Olsen, C., & Stuart, I. (2017). The Effects of Situational Professional Skepticism and Effect on Auditor's Skeptical Judgments: A Two-System Theory Perspective. In C. Olsen (Ed.), A Study of Professional Skepticism: Springer International Publishing.
Pallant, J. (2007). Survival manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS, 4. McGraw-Hill, Berkshire England.
Payne, E.A., and Ramsay, R.J. 2005. Fraud risk assessments and auditors' professional skepticism. Managerial Auditing Journal 20(3): 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900510585636 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900510585636
Peecher, M. E. (1996). "The influence of auditors' justification processes on their decisions: A cognitive model and experimental evidence". Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 34 No.1, PP 125-140. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2491335
Pham, H., Amaria, P., Bui, T., & Tran, S. (2014), "A study of audit quality in Vietnam". International Journal of Business, Accounting, & Finance, 8(2).
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) (2019a). "Release No. 105-2019-031. Order instituting disciplinary proceedings, making findings, and imposing sanctions. Available at https://pcaobus.org/Enforcement/Decisions/Documents/105-2019-009-REM.PDF Washington, DC: PCAOB, Accessed 30th March 2021
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2019b. Release No. 2019-002. Annual Report on the Interim Inspection Program Related to Audits of Brokers and Dealers. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Available at https://pcaob-assets.azureedge.net/pcaob-dev/docs/default-source/enforcement/decisions/documents/105-2019-031-pmb.pdf?sfvrsn=b4254b9e_0 Accessed : 30th March 2021.
Puspitasari, A., Baridwan, Z., & Rahman, A. F. (2019). "The Effect of Audit Competence, Independence, and Professional Skepticism on Audit Quality with Auditor's Ethics as Moderation Variables". International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 18(5), 135-144.
Quadackers, L., M. Groot, and A. Wright. (2014), "Auditor's professional skepticism: Neutrality versus presumptive doubt". Contemporary Accounting Research Vol.31No.3 Pp 639-657. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12052
Rajgopal, S., Srinivasan, S. and X. Zheng (2020), "Measuring Audit Quality" Review of Accounting Studies (Forthcoming): Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3504037 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3504037. Accessed 07th April, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3504037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3504037
Rose, J. M. (2007). "Attention to evidence of aggressive financial reporting and intentional misstatement judgments: Effects of experience and trust". Behavioral Research in Accounting, 19: 215-229. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2007.19.1.215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2007.19.1.215
Salehi M, Mansoury A and Pirayesh (2008), "Factors affecting quality of audit: Evidence from Iran", Journal of Business Research, Vol. 2, No 1, pp 1-25
Shaub, M.K., and J.E. Lawrence (1999), "Differences in auditors' professional skepticism across career levels in the firm" Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research Vol.2: Pp 61-83.
Stein, S.E., (2019). "Auditor industry specialization and accounting estimates: Evidence from asset impairments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol 38 No.2: Pp 207-234. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52231
Sundgren, S. and S. Svanström (2014). "Auditor‐in‐charge characteristics and going‐concern reporting". Contemporary Accounting Research Vol.31 No.2, Pp 531-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12035
Sutton, S.G. (1993), "Toward an understanding of the factors affecting the quality of the audit process", Decision Sciences, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 88-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1993.tb00464.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1993.tb00464.x
Turner, C. W. (2001). "Accountability demands and the auditor's evidence search strategy: The influence of reviewer preferences and the nature of the response (belief vs. action)". Journal of Accounting Research Vol.39 No.3 Pp 683-706. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00034
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Papers and contributions become the legal copyright of African Accounting and Finance Association unless otherwise agreed
